Oklahoma license plate reader law

Oklahoma — F

All states

Oklahoma sets no limit on how long a record of where your car was can be kept. Each agency decides for itself, and some decide years. A private company logging your trips in Oklahoma does not have to delete them, because there is no general privacy law here that says so. You have no clear right to see what has been collected about you.

This state exempts this data from public records. The records branch dead-ends here, and asking will not change that.

Limit on how long data is kept: None
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 7-606.1. There is no general plate-reader statute. This section authorizes a narrow uninsured-vehicle enforcement programme and sets no retention period. Source
Private cameras regulated: No
Oklahoma has no comprehensive consumer privacy law in effect, so there is no general right to have a business delete data it holds about you. Source
You can see your own record: No
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 7-606.1. No right of access is given. Source
Sharing restricted: Partial
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 7-606.1. Use is confined to detecting and enforcing the compulsory insurance law. Source
Audits required: No
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 7-606.1. No audit or report is required. Source

Graded on all five criteria. Read against the statute itself.

Write the deletion letter

Every state, compared

Where the vote stands

No votes yet. The first one decides the order.

Click a state to see how it does.

Retention counts double: how long a record of where your car was survives is the thing this tool is about.

Grades:ABCDF? Not examined

Vote for Oklahoma

Reading a state properly is a day of work against its statutes, and the money pays for the tooling and some of the time. $1.00 of USDC is one vote for doing Oklahoma next. It buys no promise about when.

Send exactly $1.000037 of USDC to

0x5AB284d85d6d5a2f702C732B2B1d6130fE3613F7
See what this address has received

Send that figure exactly. The last few millionths are how the chain records that the vote was for Oklahoma, and they are worth a twentieth of a cent.

Send it on any of these, and it is the same address on all of them: Base, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, Polygon PoS, Unichain, Linea, Avalanche, Celo, Ethereum.

It has to be real USDC, the one Circle issues. A bridged version — USDbC, USDC.e — is a different contract with the same ticker, and the count will not see it.

Every contract above was checked on its own chain on 2026-08-29: it reports the symbol USDC and six decimals, or it is not counted.

Molt sees none of this. The payment happens in your wallet and the record is public on the chain, which is also how the count is kept. Nothing stops the same person paying twice.

USDC contract, checked 2026-08-29